<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Recent Changes to its Local Algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-296</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by shagunvatsa: New Blog Post: Google&#039;s Recent Changes to its Local Algorithm -  http://tinyurl.com/yap3z9u...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by shagunvatsa: New Blog Post: Google&#8217;s Recent Changes to its Local Algorithm &#8211;  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yap3z9u.." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yap3z9u..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-218</guid>
		<description>[...] Google&#8217;s recent changes to Local Algorithm http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google&#8217;s recent changes to Local Algorithm <a href="http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm" rel="nofollow">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Google local was bringing the businesses I work for HUGE traffic as a result of our optimizing of the listings and the April&#039;s changes.  

This has been a huge blow to us and it&#039;s frustrating, but understandable, because of how easy it was to manipulate Google local.  

I have guessed that there was an over-customization penalty, so i began scaling everything back, but it is definately frustrated when you have put so much time to optimizing 50-100 listings and it all has to be reversed and changed.

That&#039;s the life of SEO though...if things don&#039;t change, we don&#039;t have to figure them out.  

My listings are still better than where they were before, but i am 100% positive that it&#039;s not an algorithm doing the penalties, etc.  If you search major keywords in large us cities especially, they are manually ordered...which is frustrating to say the least.

Hopefully the penalties are temporary and if we are &quot;good&quot; then they will update with the introduction of a better algorithm (probably based more upon natural search results. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google local was bringing the businesses I work for HUGE traffic as a result of our optimizing of the listings and the April&#8217;s changes.  </p>
<p>This has been a huge blow to us and it&#8217;s frustrating, but understandable, because of how easy it was to manipulate Google local.  </p>
<p>I have guessed that there was an over-customization penalty, so i began scaling everything back, but it is definately frustrated when you have put so much time to optimizing 50-100 listings and it all has to be reversed and changed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the life of SEO though&#8230;if things don&#8217;t change, we don&#8217;t have to figure them out.  </p>
<p>My listings are still better than where they were before, but i am 100% positive that it&#8217;s not an algorithm doing the penalties, etc.  If you search major keywords in large us cities especially, they are manually ordered&#8230;which is frustrating to say the least.</p>
<p>Hopefully the penalties are temporary and if we are &#8220;good&#8221; then they will update with the introduction of a better algorithm (probably based more upon natural search results. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chair 10 Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Chair 10 Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Thx very much for the post Shagun.  Yes, clients are very perplexed as their local Google listings have dropped or completely vanished.  It is going to take good &#039;ol SEO trial and error work to try to deduce Google&#039;s new ranking factors for local results.  For example, for businesses with multiple locations/stores, is it better to include the location&#039;s neighborhood in the Google Local Listing Company Name field or not?  For example, &quot;Jerry&#039;s Arco: Capitol Hill.&quot; (Capitol Hill being the neighborhood).  We are having some success with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx very much for the post Shagun.  Yes, clients are very perplexed as their local Google listings have dropped or completely vanished.  It is going to take good &#8216;ol SEO trial and error work to try to deduce Google&#8217;s new ranking factors for local results.  For example, for businesses with multiple locations/stores, is it better to include the location&#8217;s neighborhood in the Google Local Listing Company Name field or not?  For example, &#8220;Jerry&#8217;s Arco: Capitol Hill.&#8221; (Capitol Hill being the neighborhood).  We are having some success with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shagun Vatsa</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Shagun Vatsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Hi Taiyo - It seems like Google has made up its mind and recently rolled out new business listing &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=107528&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;guidelines&lt;/a&gt; which state that the business name should be the full legal name without the use of any keywords. Many other changes have been outlined, some of which are completely new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taiyo &#8211; It seems like Google has made up its mind and recently rolled out new business listing <a href="http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=107528" rel="nofollow">guidelines</a> which state that the business name should be the full legal name without the use of any keywords. Many other changes have been outlined, some of which are completely new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Durjoy</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Durjoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Hi, Shagun thanks for informative blogs. Googles recent changes very frustrating. so many of my clients Gone off from the list despite their listing is highly optimized. You are right there is so many list , which dont even have web pages , photos or relevant information . This is outrageous, Google should stop it .  instead google should fight spammer and fix LBC&#039;s error .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Shagun thanks for informative blogs. Googles recent changes very frustrating. so many of my clients Gone off from the list despite their listing is highly optimized. You are right there is so many list , which dont even have web pages , photos or relevant information . This is outrageous, Google should stop it .  instead google should fight spammer and fix LBC&#8217;s error .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taiyo</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Taiyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Thanks Shagun,
I read Mihm&#039;s ranking factors before and I try to apply them. And I think that is why all the recent tweaking Google seems to be doing is SO frustrating. 

For example, I have been helping an upholstery business rank on Google Local. I have been submitting their information to a number of local directories (the ones mentioned by Mihm/Blumenthal, etc.) and it has been over 4 months since I started doing this and only one of the citations (from superpages) has been picked up by Google. 

I suggested that the client ask their customers to review them on Google, they sent out an email to their best customers, and so far have had six great reviews. None of the other websites have any reviews.

From the start I also checked the most searched keywords for their location (ex: san fransisco upholstery, san fransisco window treatments) and used those as the categories. 

They were ranking around the middle of the 10 pack now, with all of Google&#039;s tweaking, they aren&#039;t showing.

Meanwhile another upholsterer has shot up out of nowhere and is ranking first using keyword spam in their business name field...
There business name field is actually 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;[biz name] Upholstery ( Window Treatments, Foam, Blinds, Furniture Repair)&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And from their site footer I can see that Yellowpages.com is doing their internet spam &quot;marketing&quot;

I have submitted them as spammers to Google for what that is worth...

An SEO from Vancouver replied on another of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/04/google-clarifies-guidelines-on-business-titles-for-maps-listing/#comment-394156&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mike&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; you mentioned elsewhere and said something that I hope Google will do in the future:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why doesn’t Google simply eliminate keywords in the company name as a ranking factor? That would eliminate any incentive to do so.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What do you think? I wonder if Google will do this and I hope that they do because really it should not be a factor in my [possibly wrong] opinion. 

It doesn&#039;t make sense to me that a company should have extra &quot;SEO juice&quot; just because they put the name of their service or city as part of their incorporated business name. 
That just penalises companies unique enough to not use a generic name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Shagun,<br />
I read Mihm&#8217;s ranking factors before and I try to apply them. And I think that is why all the recent tweaking Google seems to be doing is SO frustrating. </p>
<p>For example, I have been helping an upholstery business rank on Google Local. I have been submitting their information to a number of local directories (the ones mentioned by Mihm/Blumenthal, etc.) and it has been over 4 months since I started doing this and only one of the citations (from superpages) has been picked up by Google. </p>
<p>I suggested that the client ask their customers to review them on Google, they sent out an email to their best customers, and so far have had six great reviews. None of the other websites have any reviews.</p>
<p>From the start I also checked the most searched keywords for their location (ex: san fransisco upholstery, san fransisco window treatments) and used those as the categories. </p>
<p>They were ranking around the middle of the 10 pack now, with all of Google&#8217;s tweaking, they aren&#8217;t showing.</p>
<p>Meanwhile another upholsterer has shot up out of nowhere and is ranking first using keyword spam in their business name field&#8230;<br />
There business name field is actually </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;[biz name] Upholstery ( Window Treatments, Foam, Blinds, Furniture Repair)&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And from their site footer I can see that Yellowpages.com is doing their internet spam &#8220;marketing&#8221;</p>
<p>I have submitted them as spammers to Google for what that is worth&#8230;</p>
<p>An SEO from Vancouver replied on another of <a href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/06/04/google-clarifies-guidelines-on-business-titles-for-maps-listing/#comment-394156" rel="nofollow">Mike&#8217;s post</a> you mentioned elsewhere and said something that I hope Google will do in the future:</p>
<blockquote><p>Why doesn’t Google simply eliminate keywords in the company name as a ranking factor? That would eliminate any incentive to do so.</p></blockquote>
<p>What do you think? I wonder if Google will do this and I hope that they do because really it should not be a factor in my [possibly wrong] opinion. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me that a company should have extra &#8220;SEO juice&#8221; just because they put the name of their service or city as part of their incorporated business name.<br />
That just penalises companies unique enough to not use a generic name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shagun Vatsa</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Shagun Vatsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Hi Taiyo,

Thanks for your comments. How close your business is to the downtown core of a city is definitely an important ranking factor. If I were in you, I would think of creative ways in which you can change the location of your client. In the meantime, you might find it useful to refer to David Mihm&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Local Search Ranking Factors&lt;/a&gt;. This survey will give you an in depth knowledge of the criteria with respect to their influence on ranking factors in Google and Yahoo maps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taiyo,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. How close your business is to the downtown core of a city is definitely an important ranking factor. If I were in you, I would think of creative ways in which you can change the location of your client. In the meantime, you might find it useful to refer to David Mihm&#8217;s <a href="http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors.shtml" rel="nofollow">Local Search Ranking Factors</a>. This survey will give you an in depth knowledge of the criteria with respect to their influence on ranking factors in Google and Yahoo maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shagun Vatsa</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Shagun Vatsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Hi Henry,

Has you local business listing account been banned? If so, get in touch and I can definitely help you get your listing back up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Henry,</p>
<p>Has you local business listing account been banned? If so, get in touch and I can definitely help you get your listing back up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osborne Brook SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.shagunvatsa.com/googles-recent-changes-to-its-local-algorithm/comment-page-1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Osborne Brook SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shagunvatsa.com/?p=99#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s local is still a gray area with so many contraddictive opinions. It is a shame they do not offer some more detailed and clear guidelines so seo experts do not spend their time without being  sure what the outcome of their seo practices will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s local is still a gray area with so many contraddictive opinions. It is a shame they do not offer some more detailed and clear guidelines so seo experts do not spend their time without being  sure what the outcome of their seo practices will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
